Tips, tutorials, and commentary on pedagogy, productivity, and technology in higher education.

New Faculty Writing Groups

In composition, writing groups are standard operating procedure.  It’s in these groups that we learn to write, learn to read, and learn to be constructive critics of others’ work.  (Or, that’s the goal.)  First-year students need guidance when they learn these skills.  They need to know they are not alone as they become competent in academic writing, and they need to learn that others have strategies and skills that might be helpful to them.  First-year students are not the only ones who need this type of support.  So do first-year tenure-track faculty.

Forming a writing group for first-year tenure-track faculty is a proven method of helping these faculty members strengthen their confidence as academic writers in the often overwhelming and stressful time of acclimating to a new career, a new life, and a new professional perception of one’s self.  Writing groups can help new faculty members feel they are not alone as they struggle to (re)locate their writing mojo after the often exhausting work of completing the dissertation.

The benefits of a writing group

In the television series Lost, a common phrase many of the characters mutter is, “live together or die alone.”  We could look at academia the same way.  An academic career—we have all heard the lore—is a solitary and isolating experience, particularly when we are writing.  It doesn’t have to be so.  Groups can make the writing experience more meaningful and fruitful.

Another benefit of writing groups is that your writing group peers can hold you accountable for your work.  If, for example, you state that you will turn your dissertation chapter into an article by a certain date (next week?!?), your writing group colleagues will remind you about your progress.  This is not to say that you need reminding, of course; you will always remember what you haven’t yet completed, but the external voices of reminder can be helpful.  These writing group colleagues can motivate you to meet the goals you set for yourself.  Likewise, you will do the same for them.  Indeed, sometimes the role of a writing group is to help each other set realistic goals for ourselves.

Additionally, these groups allow you to meet colleagues from across campus, and the groups can help you discover what these colleagues are working on.  Maybe there is an opportunity for cross-disciplinary collaboration.  Maybe you have a scientific perspective on a particular issue that, as a fine arts scholar, your colleague does not share.  You can inform her work.  She can inform yours.

Types of Groups

Writing groups can form based on broad field divisions (social sciences, hard sciences, humanities, fine arts) or by department (political science, English, chemistry, drama).  You can form groups based on any number of different factors.  It’s important to recognize that each group member will have varying needs and perspectives (as well as personalities).  Groups will need to be sensitive to those individual needs.  That means you might need more than one type of group.  That’s OK.  The more groups the merrier (and potentially, the more successful).  The groups can be as small or as large as you wish; however, smaller groups can be more focused, and therefore, can be more effective.

The obstacles of a writing group

Some of the obstacles in new faculty writing groups are similar to those found in first-year composition courses:  (1) lack of sincerity or commitment to the group/process, (2) the inability (or unwillingness) to offer usable feedback on another’s work, and (3) scheduling.

Some members of your group might not be getting what they need, so they stop attending meetings and participating in reviews.  In this case, restructuring the group might be beneficial.  Second, scheduling can be difficult, as new faculty members are juggling many activities as they settle into their new careers.  As George noted in an earlier ProfHacker column, Doodle can help in that regard.  If face-to-face meetings are problematic, online meetings can also work.  Lastly, just as in most first-year composition classes, the critique of another’s work is difficult.  No one wants to be harsh in his or her feedback to a potential life-long colleague, but the disingenuous comment, “oh, it’s good” doesn’t do anyone any favors.  Constructive feedback is a learned skill that requires time and trust.

How do you get started?

First, you will want to ask yourself some questions.  (summarized from an article in AAUP by Jennifer I. Friend and Juan Carlos González, “Get Together to Write.”

  • What do I want from a writing group?
  • What do I expect from a reader of my works-in-progress?
  • What do I expect to contribute as a reader of others’ works-in-progress?
  • What are my priorities for a writing group?
  • What’s more important to me: professional publication, or personal satisfaction?
  • What kind of timeframe can I reasonably expect to maintain?
  • What kind of interaction with others do I want (face-to-face meetings once a month, online forums daily)?

You can ask first-year tenure-track faculty who are in your cohort to join you in a writing group.  You could work through your dean.  You could ask the Excellence in Teaching center (or the equivalent on your campus) for recommendations. Your dean or other campus mentors could help you find facilitators for your group if that’s the way you want to go.  (You might also choose not to have an outside person in your group, as sharing responsibility among group members is more your style.)

What do you have to add?

What have been your experiences with writing groups (face-to-face, online, or other forms)?  What are some of the solutions to writing group obstacles you have found?  What are some of the many benefits?  What advice could you offer new tenure-track faculty as they begin the process of writing for a living?  Leave your advice/comments below.

[Photo by Flickr user margolove; Creative Commons licensed]

4 Comments

  1. Posted September 30, 2009 at 8:41 am | Permalink

    This is a great post, Billie. And although you don’t say so explicitly, new faculty writing groups are a valuable form of mentoring: not every mentor is someone senior to us, after all, and we can learn a lot from peers.

    To answer your questions:
    I’ve had very good experiences with writing groups. In graduate school I had a “dissertation partner” (yes, we made up that term): both of us were writing about religion and culture in the eighteenth-century Anglo-American world and so we met regularly not just to review each others’ drafts but also to talk about what we were thinking. It helped alleviate the isolation that writing often brings.
    In tenure-track job #1, the junior faculty in English formed a group to read each other’s work with the aim of getting stuff out there in circulation to be considered for publication. I enjoyed (and benefited from) reading the work of others, but when people read my work they tended to say they thought it was interesting but didn’t see what was important about it. That took me awhile to process: frontload the claims about significance…
    In tenure-track job #2 (where the teaching load is twice as heavy, making writing productivity more of a challenge), one of our recent hires started up a “Works in Progress” group last year, and it’s been helpful though I must admit to not providing others with enough feedback (because I tend to get swamped in my own busy-ness after about 4 or 5 weeks of a new semester).
    The value of writing groups, in my opinion, is that they create a low-stakes environment featuring a deadline that you’re expected to meet. The “low-stakes” part is key because for people prone to anxiety (ahem), writing only for a deadline where something really, really important is on the line can be paralyzing.
    It’s crucial (again, in my opinion) to leave behind the graduate school habit of showing how smart you are as a reader by pointing out all the problems in someone else’s writing. That’s not especially helpful. Instead, readers should focus on describing the specific changes the writer should make before sending the piece in question out for consideration by a journal or publisher. However, not everyone finds criticism-heavy responses as frustrating as I do. I get overwhelmed if there are 2 dozen things thrown into the mix by a half-dozen different readers.
    As far as advice for anyone who needs to be productive in their writing…
    Write every day, even if you don’t feel like writing, even if it’s only for a short amount of time, and even if you think that what you write is terrible. I’m not up on the latest empirical research regarding this, but the last time I checked, studies of faculty habits and productivity outcomes showed that regular, steady writing sessions involving modest progress were much more effective that irregular “binges” requiring great leaps forward in a short amount of time. Check out, for example, research by Robert Boice or use Writing Your Dissertation in 15 Minutes a Day, by Joan Bolker, as a “how-to” guide to jumpstarting your writing.
    Remember that your primary goal should be to produce something that’s good, not something that’s perfect. And don’t be as afraid as I always am about submitting your stuff to journals in your field.
  2. Posted October 1, 2009 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    Is it possible to form a writing group across different campuses? Where I am, not a great deal of emphasis (actually, no emphasis) is placed upon scholarly pursuits. I am interested in writing a paper or two and a writing group would be great, but it isn’t possible here.

    • Jason B. Jones
      Posted October 1, 2009 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

      Yes! Depending on your location, you can partner with people at other institutions. (Granted, this is much easier some places than others.)

      But there’s also the internet. I think, but can’t quite remember, that some of the ProfHacker writers participated in a writing group with some other bloggy academics back in the halcyon days of academic blogging . . . maybe one of them can speak to it. (Or anyone else with direct experience, for that matter . . . )

  3. Natalie Houston
    Posted October 2, 2009 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Sometimes I actually think it’s more helpful to form a group with people not in your own department or at your own institution. Especially for junior faculty, it can feel freeing not to have to wonder how your performance in writing group will be taken into account outside of the group.

    In the “halcyon days of academic blogging,” I was part of an internet based writing group that was not one in which we shared drafts, but rather we checked in with each other at regular intervals (2x/week) about our writing goals for the week and then how we did in meeting them. It was helpful in creating a sense of commitment to your intentions as well as constructive support (if you thought you would write 75 pages in a week, someone could gently suggest that you form a more reasonable goal). Maybe that’s what Jason is remembering?

    And nowadays there are additional technologies that would enhance an internet-based writing community. (Maybe I’ll write a post about this next week, as I think I have more to say than should go in a comment box.)

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WP Hashcash

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Subscribe without commenting